The AK-Niederösterreich-President demanded a legal repair of this “” untenable situation “”.

The AK-Niederösterreich-President demanded a legal repair of this “” untenable situation “”.

The AK-Niederösterreich-President demanded a legal repair of this “” untenable situation “”. “” It must not be the case that precisely those who offer children warmth and a temporary home are punished for it, “” said Wieser.

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

In the conflict about the receipt of childcare allowance by crisis foster parents, the Supreme Court (OGH) ruled in one case that the parents are entitled to the care allowance from the first day and not only after 91 days, as stipulated in the law under turquoise blue. In his judgment, which is available to the APA, the judge indirectly criticizes the legislature.

The AK-Niederösterreich, which led the process, demands a legal repair and wants to sue the claims for other affected persons as well. “” Crisis care parents do an important and valuable job for society. You should be grateful to them instead of making life difficult for them. However, the current legal regulation punishes their commitment to children in difficult situations because they often do not receive any childcare allowance “, criticizes AK Lower Austria President and ÖGB Lower Austria Chairman Markus Wieser.

Also interesting: Temporary parenting – what it means to take in foster children

Only available from 91 days of care

The debate about the receipt of childcare allowance by crisis foster parents has been going on for around a year and began with the fact that some health insurers suddenly no longer granted childcare allowance to crisis foster parents due to two OGH judgments that only touched on this topic in passing. When this problem became public, the turquoise-blue government decided to change the law, according to which crisis care parents are on an equal footing with biological parents and are therefore entitled to benefits. However, they were in a worse position to the extent that they are only entitled to care from 91 days, birth parents are entitled after 61 days.

Long waiting time problematic

“” But that is exactly what is problematic for parents in a crisis, since the children are often only with the family for a few days or weeks and the parents in crisis care for the money, “criticizes Wieser. “” Almost half of the crisis foster parents in Lower Austria therefore do not receive any childcare allowance. “” The Supreme Court judge now found that crisis foster parents establish a joint household with the child on the first day they take over and an ex-post differentiation according to how long this care actually lasted is not relevant for the decision on the application for child care allowance.essaywriter discounts An ex-post differentiation would also contradict the equalization of crisis foster parents as important reference persons for children in emergency situations with foster parents, which the legislator is striving for with the new regulation.

AK demands legal repair of this “” untenable situation “”

The judge also notes critically that the new regulation of a minimum duration of 91 days cannot be explained with the still valid minimum payment duration of 61 days for biological parents. The AK-Niederösterreich-President demanded a legal repair of this “” untenable situation “”. “” It must not be the case that precisely those who offer children warmth and a temporary home are punished for it, “” said Wieser.

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

In the conflict about the receipt of childcare allowance by crisis foster parents, the Supreme Court (OGH) ruled in one case that the parents are entitled to the care allowance from the first day and not only after 91 days, as stipulated in the law under turquoise blue. In his judgment, which is available to the APA, the judge indirectly criticizes the legislature.

The AK-Niederösterreich, which led the process, demands a legal repair and wants to sue the claims for other affected persons as well. “” Crisis care parents do an important and valuable job for society. You should be grateful to them instead of making life difficult for them. However, the current legal regulation punishes their commitment to children in difficult situations because they often do not receive any childcare allowance “, criticizes AK Lower Austria President and ÖGB Lower Austria Chairman Markus Wieser.

Also interesting: Temporary parenting – what it means to take in foster children

Only available from 91 days of care

The debate about the receipt of childcare allowance by crisis foster parents has been going on for around a year and began with the fact that some health insurers suddenly no longer granted childcare allowance to crisis foster parents due to two OGH judgments that only touched on this topic in passing. When this problem became public, the turquoise-blue government decided to change the law, according to which crisis care parents are on an equal footing with biological parents and are therefore entitled to benefits. However, they were in a worse position to the extent that they are only entitled to care from 91 days, birth parents are entitled after 61 days.

Long waiting time problematic

“” But that is exactly what is problematic for parents in a crisis, since the children are often only with the family for a few days or weeks and the parents in crisis care for the money, “criticizes Wieser. “” Almost half of the crisis foster parents in Lower Austria therefore do not receive any childcare allowance. “” The Supreme Court judge now found that crisis foster parents establish a joint household with the child on the first day they take over and an ex-post differentiation according to how long this care actually lasted is not relevant for the decision on the application for child care allowance. An ex-post differentiation would also contradict the equalization of crisis foster parents as important reference persons for children in emergency situations with foster parents, which the legislator is striving for with the new regulation.

AK demands legal repair of this “” untenable situation “”

The judge also notes critically that the new regulation of a minimum duration of 91 days cannot be explained with the still valid minimum payment duration of 61 days for biological parents. The AK-Niederösterreich-President demanded a legal repair of this “” untenable situation “”. “” It must not be the case that precisely those who offer children warmth and a temporary home are punished for it, “” said Wieser.

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

In the conflict about the receipt of childcare allowance by crisis foster parents, the Supreme Court (OGH) ruled in one case that the parents are entitled to the care allowance from the first day and not only after 91 days, as stipulated in the law under turquoise blue. In his judgment, which is available to the APA, the judge indirectly criticizes the legislature.

The AK-Niederösterreich, which led the process, demands a legal repair and wants to sue the claims for other affected persons as well. “” Crisis care parents do an important and valuable job for society. You should be grateful to them instead of making life difficult for them. However, the current legal regulation punishes their commitment to children in difficult situations because they often do not receive any childcare allowance “, criticizes AK Lower Austria President and ÖGB Lower Austria Chairman Markus Wieser.

Also interesting: Temporary parenting – what it means to take in foster children

Only available from 91 days of care

The debate about the receipt of childcare allowance by crisis foster parents has been going on for around a year and began with the fact that some health insurers suddenly no longer granted childcare allowance to crisis foster parents due to two OGH judgments that only touched on this topic in passing. When this problem became public, the turquoise-blue government decided to change the law, according to which crisis care parents are on an equal footing with biological parents and are therefore entitled to benefits. However, they were in a worse position to the extent that they are only entitled to care from 91 days, birth parents are entitled after 61 days.

Long waiting time problematic

“” But that is exactly what is problematic for parents in a crisis, since the children are often only with the family for a few days or weeks and the parents in crisis care for the money, “criticizes Wieser. “” Almost half of the crisis foster parents in Lower Austria therefore do not receive any childcare allowance. “” The Supreme Court judge now found that crisis foster parents establish a joint household with the child on the first day they take over and an ex-post differentiation according to how long this care actually lasted is not relevant for the decision on the application for child care allowance. An ex-post differentiation would also contradict the equalization of crisis foster parents as important reference persons for children in emergency situations with foster parents, which the legislator is striving for with the new regulation.

AK demands legal repair of this “” untenable situation “”

The judge also notes critically that the new regulation of a minimum duration of 91 days cannot be explained with the still valid minimum payment duration of 61 days for biological parents. The AK-Niederösterreich-President demanded a legal repair of this “” untenable situation “”. “” It must not be the case that precisely those who offer children warmth and a temporary home are punished for it, “” said Wieser.

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Raising children is not always easy, but for some it is more than that, it is not possible. Then foster parents come into play, people who agree to take in children from difficult backgrounds for an indefinite period of time. Unfortunately, there is never enough of them, the City of Vienna explains a permanent shortage. But what does foster parenthood actually mean, what challenges does it bring and why is it still worth it? This is reported by a foster parents couple.

“The task of child and youth welfare is of course to try to get children to regain a foothold in their family of origin,” explains Martina Reichl-Roßbacher, head social worker at the Department for Adopted and Foster Children of the City of Vienna, explaining the crucial point: a foster child can theoretically come back to his birth parents at any time. A subtle emphasis is placed on theoretical, because such a return rarely happens in practice, as Reichl-Roßbacher explains, “but it does happen” she wants to emphasize.

Most common reason: neglect

Before talking about repatriation, however, a child must first leave their original family. The most common reason for this step is neglect, “that means that the care is in a bad way”, as the long-time social worker explains, “that the children are not adequately cared for and there is no continuity in their life”. The problem is often paired with other issues such as bad relationships or alcohol. In a first step, of course, attempts would always be made to support the parents in improving the situation, but “there are parents who simply cannot do this because they usually haven’t experienced it themselves and often don’t have any resources,” says Reichl -Rossbacher.

Requirements for foster parents

If the child is then taken from the family, it is first either placed in a crisis care family (children under three years of age) or a crisis center (children between three and 15 years of age). After six to eight weeks, in the best case scenario, the relocation to the permanent foster family takes place, who have qualified for this by fulfilling certain requirements (no previous convictions, sufficient living space, fixed income, …) and completing a 52-hour seminar. The marital status (single, married, same-sex, …) is irrelevant.

“Foster parents equip that they have a very, very open attitude.”

Rather, what matters is “that you can not only imagine life with a child, but actually arrange it. You have to explain what resources you have and think about how much time you can make available for a child, ”explains the person in charge. “Foster parents equip that they have a very, very open attitude. Many have the approach: We accompany a child. Of course we would like it to grow up with us and grow up, but actually we accompany it – also in dealing with its identification, with its parents’ house. ”

Social component

Of course, a certain social component also plays a role, as both Reichl-Roßbacher and the foster parents who spoke to News.at about their situation explain: “We wanted a child who had a difficult start in life, offer the chance to grow up in a secure, safe and loving environment, ”says the 46-year-old foster father about the motives of the couple, whose own desire to have children has so far remained unfulfilled.